Even if this Β«trapΒ» does not exist, there is a fourth element to Keynesβs critique. Saving involves not spending all of oneβs income. It means insufficient demand for business output, unless it is balanced by other sources of demand. Thus, excessive saving corresponds to an unwanted accumulation of inventories. This pile-up of unsold goods and materials encourages businesses to decrease both production and employment. This in turn lowers peopleβs incomes β and saving, causing a leftward shift in the S line in the diagram. For Keynes, the fall in income did most of the job ending excessive saving and allowing the loanable funds market to attain equilibrium. Instead of interest-rate adjustment solving the problem, a recession does so.
Whereas the classical economists assumed that the level of output and income was constant at any one time (except for short-lived deviations), Keynes saw this as the key variable that adjusted to equate saving and investment.
Finally, a recession undermines the business incentive to engage in fixed investment. With falling incomes and demand for products, the desired demand for factories and equipment (not to mention housing) will fall. This accelerator effect would shift the I line to the left again. This recreates the problem of excessive saving and encourages the recession to continue.
Active Fiscal Policy
The classicals wanted to balance the government budget through slashing expenditures or raising taxes. To Keynes, this would exacerbate the underlying problem: following either policy would raise saving and thus lower the demand for products and labor. Keynes saw H. Hooverβs June 1932 tax hike as making the Great Depression worse.
Keynesβs ideas influenced Franklin D. Rooseveltβs view that insufficient buying power caused the Depression. Something similar to Keynesian expansionary policies had been applied earlier by both social-democratic Sweden and Nazi Germany. But to many the true success of Keynesian policy can be seen at the onset of World War II, which provided a kick to the world economy, removed uncertainty, and forced the rebuilding of destroyed capital. Keynesian ideas became almost official in social-democratic Europe after the war and in the U.S. in the 1960s.
Keynesβs theory suggested that active government policy could be effective in managing the economy. Keynes advocated counter-cyclical fiscal policies, that is policies which acted against the tide of the business cycle: deficit spending when a nationβs economy suffers from recession or when recovery is long-delayed and unemployment is persistently high β and the suppression of inflation in boom times by either increasing taxes or reducing government outlays. He argued that governments should solve short-term problems rather than waiting for market forces to do it.
This contrasted with the classical and neoclassical economic analysis of fiscal policy. Deficit spending could stimulate production. But to these schools, there was no reason to believe that this stimulation would outrun the side-effects that Β«crowd outΒ» private investment: first, it would increase the demand for labor and raise wages, hurting profitability. Second, a government deficit increases the stock of government bonds, reducing their market price and encouraging high interest rates, making it more expensive for business to finance fixed investment. Thus, efforts to stimulate the economy would be self-defeating. Worse, it would be shifting resources away from productive use by the private sector to wasteful use by the government.
The Keynesian response is that such fiscal policy is only appropriate when unemployment is persistently high. In that case, crowding out is minimal. Further, private investment can be Β«crowded inΒ»: fiscal stimulus raises the market for business output, raising cash flow and profitability, spurring business optimism. To Keynes, this accelerator effect meant that government and business could be complements rather than substitutes in this situation. Second, as the stimulus occurs, GDP rises, raising the amount of saving, helping to finance the increase in fixed investment. Finally, government outlays need not always be wasteful: government investment in public goods that will not be provided by profit-seekers will encourage the private sectorβs growth. That is, government spending on basic research, public health, education, and infrastructure could help the long-term growth of potential output.
In Keynesβ theory, there must be significant slack in the labor market before fiscal expansion is justified. It is important to distinguish between mere deficit spending and Keynesianism. Governments had long used deficits to finance wars. But Keynesian policy is not merely spending: it is the proposition that sometimes the economy needs active fiscal policy. Keynesianism recommends counter-cyclical policies, for example raising taxes when there is abundant demand-side growth to cool the economy and to prevent inflation, even if there is a budget surplus. Classical economics argues that one should cut taxes when there are budget surpluses, to return money to private hands. Because deficits grow during recessions, classicals call for cuts in outlays. Keynes encourages increased deficits during downturns. In the Keynesian view, the classical policy exacerbates the business cycle. In the classical view, Keynesianism is almost literally fiscal madness.
The Β«Multiplier EffectΒ»
The Β«Keynesian multiplierΒ» has important implications for policy. The effect on demand of any exogenous increase in spending, such as an increase in government outlays is a multiple of that increase β until potential is reached. Thus, a government could stimulate a great deal of new production with a modest outlay: if the government spends, the people who receive this money then spend most on consumption goods and save the rest. This extra spending allows businesses to hire more people and pay them, which in turn allows a further increase in consumer spending. This process continues. At each step, the increase in spending is smaller than in the previous step, so that the multiplier process tapers off and allows the attainment of equilibrium.
Source: Wikepedia
Essential Vocabulary
1. macro-level β ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ
2. micro-level β ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ
3. aggregate demand β ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΊΡΠΏΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡ
4. goods n β ΡΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ, ΠΈΠ·Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΠ΅ (Π² ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π°)
5. deflation n β Π΄Π΅ΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡ
6.supply-side economics β ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
7. gold standard β Π·ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡ
8. treaty n β Π΄ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ
9. currency n β Π²Π°Π»ΡΡΠ°
10. peg n β Π±Π°Π·Π°, ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡ, ΡΠΎΡΠΊΠ° ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ°
pegging n β ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΊΠ°, ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ
peg v β ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²ΡΠ·ΡΠ²Π°ΡΡ, ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ
11. centrally-planned economy β ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΊΠ°
12. effective demand β ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΉ (ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ) ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡ
13.interest rate β ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΊΠ°
14. real wage β ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ Π·Π°ΡΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡ (Π·Π°ΡΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΠ° Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π½Π° ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡ)
15. nominal wage β Π½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π·Π°ΡΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΠ°
16. barter n β Π±Π°ΡΡΠ΅Ρ
barter v β ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡ Π±Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠ΅Π½
17. trade (labor) union β ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ·
18. depression n β Π΄Π΅ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡ (ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ Π²ΡΠ»ΠΎΠΉ Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ)
19. laissez faire β ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡΡΠΈΠ½Π°, ΠΏΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄ΡΡΡΠ°Ρ ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Π²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π° Π² ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΊΡ
20. inelasticity n β Π½Π΅ΡΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ (ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ° ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ)
inelastic a β Π½Π΅ΡΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠΉ
elasticity n β ΡΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ (ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ° ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ)
elastic a β ΡΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠΉ
21. liquidity trap β Β«Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π½Π°Ρ Π»ΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠΊΠ°Β»
22. floor n β ΠΏΠΎΠ» (Π·Π΄. ΡΠΎΡΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΡΠΉ Π·Π°Π» Π±ΠΈΡΠΆΠΈ, ΡΠΎΡΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈ ΠΌΠ°Π³Π°Π·ΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΌΡΠΉ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅Π½ Π»ΠΈΠ±ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΊΠΈ)
23. bond holder β Π²Π»Π°Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π»ΠΈΠ³Π°ΡΠΈΠΉ
24. deviation n β ΠΎΡΠΊΠ»ΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅
deviate v β ΠΎΡΠΊΠ»ΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΡ
25. accelerator effect β ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡ Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ° (ΡΡΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Ρ) (Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ·Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ² ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ° ΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ ΠΈΠ½Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΉ)
26. tax (price) hike β ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ² (ΡΠ΅Π½)
27. buying (purchasing) power β ΠΏΠΎΠΊΡΠΏΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ
28. expansionary policy β ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°
29. counter-cyclical β Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ
30. deficit spending β Π΄Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅
31. outlay n β ΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄Ρ, Π°ΡΡΠΈΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, Π·Π°ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ, ΠΈΠ·Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΊΠΈ
32. crowding out n β Π²ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅
crowd out v β Π²ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΡΡ
33. government bond β ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π»ΠΈΠ³Π°ΡΠΈΡ
34.public goods β ΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ»ΡΠ³ΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ»ΡΠΆΠ°Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·Π΅ Π²ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ
35. slack n β Π·Π°Π·ΠΎΡ, Π»ΡΡΡ, ΡΠΏΠ°Π΄ (Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ), ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΉ; Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·Π±ΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ, ΡΠ΅Π·Π΅ΡΠ²
slack a β Π·Π°ΡΡΠΎΠΉΠ½ΡΠΉ, Π²ΡΠ»ΡΠΉ, Π±Π΅Π·Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΠΉ
36. demand-side β Π½Π° ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π΅ ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ°
37. cooling n β ΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ (ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ), Π·Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π΄Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅, ΠΎΡ Π»Π°ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅
38. multiplier n β ΠΌΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΎΡ
multiplier a β ΠΌΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΉ
39. exogenous a β ΡΠΊΠ·ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ, Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΉ
Exercise 1. Answer the following questions.
1. What is the most famous book by John M.Keynes? 2. What is the driving factor of the economic process according to Keynes? 3. In what way did Keynesβ theory conflict with the supply-side economics? 4. How did Keynes explain the level of output and employment in the economy? 5. How did Keynes regard the determination of wages? 6. What was the problem with excessive savings in Keynesβ views? 7. What is the Β«liquidity trapΒ»? 8. How did Keynes justify the active government policy? 9. Why did the classic economists regard Keynesianism as Β«fiscal madnessΒ»? 10. What is Keynesian multiplier?
Exercise 2*. Find terms in the text that match definitions given below and make sentences of your own with each term.
1. the theory that excessive central government borrowing on capital markets will consume funds otherwise available for private investment
2. notes and coins that are the current medium of exchange in a country
3. a form of international exchange practiced until the 1930s. Each countryβs national currency was linked by a fixed rate to gold and varied in volume with the amount of gold held
4. a fall in the purchasing power of money, reflected in a persistent increase in the general level of prices as measured by the retail price index
5. the proportion of a sum of money that is paid over a specified period of time in payment for its loan
6. the act of placing monetary resources into the creation of assets in the manufacturing and service sectors of the economy
7. a monetary situation in which interest rates fall so low that only a rise can be anticipated. Since any rise would only depress the price of bonds, the compulsion to remain in cash persists. At this point, no increase in the money supply can increase peopleβs preference for cash or therefore have any effect on incomes.
8. the quantity of money in circulation in economy
9. to maintain a national currency at a fixed exchange value in terms of another
10. income not spent on consumption
Exercise 3. You are a journalist writing for Fortune and you are asked to interview John Kenneth Galbraith. Make a dialogue between these two individuals using the following briefing materials.
John K. Galbraith (born October 15, 1908) is a widely read 20th century economist, from the American Institutional Economics school. The Canadian-born author of four dozen books and over one thousand articles was on the faculty of Harvard University from 1934 to 1975. He served in the administrations of Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson. In 1961, Kennedy appointed him ambassador to India, where he served until 1963.
Galbraith is considered something of an iconoclast by many economists because he uses non-technical political economy instead of mathematical modeling. Additionally certain economists have alleged that he does not base his conclusions on solid research. In some of his books on economic topics he describes ways in which economic theory does not always mesh with real life.
In American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power published in 1952, Galbraith outlined how the American economy would be managed by a triumvirate of big business, big labor, and an activist government. He contrasted this with the previous pre-depression era where big business had relatively free rein over the economy.