57
Rosenne Sh. Provisional Measures in Interbational Law. OUP, 2005. P. 3.
58
Electricity Company of Sofia and Bulgaria (Interim Measures) case, PCIJ, Series a/b 79, 1939. P. 199.
59
Rosenne Sh. Op. cit. P. 46.
60
Saxena J. N. Limits of compulsory jurisdiction in respect of the law of the sea disputes // Law of the sea. Caracas and beyond / Ed. by R. P. Anand. The Hague; Boston; L., 1980.
61
ΠΠ΅ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ² ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ΄Π° ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π°ΡΠ±ΠΈΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ° ΡΠΌ: Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea, U. N. Office of Legal Affairs, Settlement of Disputes Mechanism: Choice of Procedure by States Parties Under Article 287 of the Convention. βΉhttp://www.un.org/Depts/los/lossdm1.htmβΊ
62
Π‘Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ½Π° Π’. Π. ΠΡΠ±ΠΈΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ²: ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Ρ Π΄ΠΈΡΡβ¦ ΠΊ. Ρ. Π½. Π., 2007. Π‘. 7.
63
Π’Π°ΠΌ ΠΆΠ΅.
64
Π₯ΡΠ±ΠΈΠ΅Π²Π° Π. Π . ΠΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡ ΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ Π°ΡΠ±ΠΈΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅ΠΉ, ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ Π² ΠΠΎΠ½Π²Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΠΠ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Ρ 1982 Π³.: ΠΠΈΡΡ. ΠΊ. Ρ. Π½. Π., 2012. Π‘. 28β29.
65
Π₯ΡΠ±ΠΈΠ΅Π²Π° Π. Π . Π£ΠΊΠ°Π·. ΡΠΎΡ. Π‘. 30.
66
Churchill R. Some Reflections on the Operation of the Dispute Settlement System of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea During its First Decade // The Law of the Sea. Progress and Prospects. Freestone D., Barnes R., Ong D. (eds). 2006. P. 294.
67
Π₯ΡΠ±ΠΈΠ΅Π²Π° Π. Π . Π£ΠΊΠ°Π·. ΡΠΎΡ. Π‘. 29.
68
Statement of Sri Lanka, 187th meeting. Official Records of the Third United nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. Vol. 17. P. 48. Para. 161.
69
Statement by the UN Secretary-General, 14th meeting, 20 June 1974, Official Records of the Third United nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. Vol. 1. P. 38. Para. 42.
70
Π’Π°ΠΌ ΠΆΠ΅.
71
ΠΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Ρ. UN Doc. A/Conf.62/L.22, Official Records of the Third United nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. Vol. 9. P. 180.
72
ΠΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΠΎΡΡΡΠ³Π°Π»ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ Π΄Π΅Π»Π°ΠΌ. Doc. A/Conf.62/L.23, Official Records of the Third United nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. Vol. 9. P. 181.
73
Π‘ΠΌ.: Nordquist M. et al. eds. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. A Commentary. V. 5. 1989. P. 252β253.
74
Π‘ΠΌ., Π½Π°ΠΏΡ.: Freestone D., Oude Elferink A. Flexibility and Innovation in the Law of the Sea: Will the LOS Convention amendment procedures ever be used? // Oude Elferink A. (ed.) Stability and Change in the Law of the Sea: the Role of the LOS Convention, 2005. P. 173β183.
75
Freestone D., Barnes R., Ong D. (eds.). The Law of the Sea. Progress and Prospects. OUP, 2010. P. 14.
76
Stephen M. Schwebel, President of the International Court of Justice. Address to the United Nations General Assembly. 26 October 1999.
77
Shigeru Oda. Some Reflections on the Dispute Settlement Clauses in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea // J. Macaraczyk (ed.) Essays in International Law, in Honour of Judge Manfred Lachs, 1984. P. 115.
78
A. Boyle. Dispute Settlement and the Law of the Sea Convention: Problems of Fragmentation and Jurisdiction//International and Comparative Law Quarterly. V. 46. 1997.
79
A. Boyle. Op. cit. P. 41.
80
ΠΡΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ ΠΠ΅Π½Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΈ ΠΠΠ, ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΉ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π°.
81
Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission Β«Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International LawΒ» (Analytical Study) (2006) UN Doc A/CN.4/L.682.
82
Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission Β«Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International LawΒ» (Conclusions) (2006) UN Doc A/CN/.4/L.702.
83
Π‘ΠΌ., Π½Π°ΠΏΡ.: Alvarez J. E. International Organizations as Law-makers. OUP, 2006. Π . 259.
84
Shahabuddeen M. Precedent in the World Court. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
85
Ibid. P. 232.
86
Ibid. P. 86, 90.
87
Β«stare decisisΒ» β ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ Π² Π°Π½Π³Π»ΠΎ-Π°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠΈΡΠΏΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π΅Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΡΠ΄Π° ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π΅ ΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π±Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, Π±Π»Π°Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ.
88
Oda Sh. The International Court of Justice Viewed from the Bench (1976β1993) // Recueil des Cours, V. 244. 1993. P. 144β155.
89
Shahabuddeen M. Precedent in the World Court. P. 8β9.
90
Π¨ΠΈΠ½ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π. Π. Π£ΠΊΠ°Π·. ΡΠΎΡ. Π‘. 100.