Π§ΠΈΡ‚Π°ΠΉΡ‚Π΅ ΠΊΠ½ΠΈΠ³ΠΈ ΠΎΠ½Π»Π°ΠΉΠ½ Π½Π° Bookidrom.ru! БСсплатныС ΠΊΠ½ΠΈΠ³ΠΈ Π² ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠ΅

Π§ΠΈΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ ΠΎΠ½Π»Π°ΠΉΠ½ Β«ΠŸΡ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡƒΠ½Π°Ρ€ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠ±ΡƒΠ½Π°Π»Π° ΠΏΠΎ морскому ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΡƒΒ». Π‘Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π½ΠΈΡ†Π° 10

Автор Π”ΠΆΡƒΠ»ΡŒΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ‚Π° Абгарян

57

Rosenne Sh. Provisional Measures in Interbational Law. OUP, 2005. P. 3.

58

Electricity Company of Sofia and Bulgaria (Interim Measures) case, PCIJ, Series a/b 79, 1939. P. 199.

59

Rosenne Sh. Op. cit. P. 46.

60

Saxena J. N. Limits of compulsory jurisdiction in respect of the law of the sea disputes // Law of the sea. Caracas and beyond / Ed. by R. P. Anand. The Hague; Boston; L., 1980.

61

Π”Π΅ΠΊΠ»Π°Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ государств ΠΎ Π²Ρ‹Π±ΠΎΡ€Π΅ суда ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π°Ρ€Π±ΠΈΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠ° см: Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea, U. N. Office of Legal Affairs, Settlement of Disputes Mechanism: Choice of Procedure by States Parties Under Article 287 of the Convention. β€Ήhttp://www.un.org/Depts/los/lossdm1.htmβ€Ί

62

Баксина Π’. Π“. АрбитраТноС ΡƒΡ€Π΅Π³ΡƒΠ»ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ мСТгосударствСнных морских споров: АвторСфСрат дисс… ΠΊ. ю. Π½. М., 2007. Π‘. 7.

63

Π’Π°ΠΌ ΠΆΠ΅.

64

Π₯ΡƒΠ±ΠΈΠ΅Π²Π° М. Π . ΠŸΡ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡƒΠ½Π°Ρ€ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ‹Ρ… судов ΠΈ Π°Ρ€Π±ΠΈΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠ΅ΠΉ, прСдусмотрСнных Π² ΠšΠΎΠ½Π²Π΅Π½Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ООН ΠΏΠΎ морскому ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Ρƒ 1982 Π³.: Дисс. ΠΊ. ю. Π½. М., 2012. Π‘. 28–29.

65

Π₯ΡƒΠ±ΠΈΠ΅Π²Π° М. Π . Π£ΠΊΠ°Π·. соч. Π‘. 30.

66

Churchill R. Some Reflections on the Operation of the Dispute Settlement System of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea During its First Decade // The Law of the Sea. Progress and Prospects. Freestone D., Barnes R., Ong D. (eds). 2006. P. 294.

67

Π₯ΡƒΠ±ΠΈΠ΅Π²Π° М. Π . Π£ΠΊΠ°Π·. соч. Π‘. 29.

68

Statement of Sri Lanka, 187th meeting. Official Records of the Third United nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. Vol. 17. P. 48. Para. 161.

69

Statement by the UN Secretary-General, 14th meeting, 20 June 1974, Official Records of the Third United nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. Vol. 1. P. 38. Para. 42.

70

Π’Π°ΠΌ ΠΆΠ΅.

71

ΠŸΡ€Π΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠŸΠ΅Ρ€Ρƒ ΠΎ создании постоянной комиссии ΠΏΠΎ морскому ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Ρƒ. UN Doc. A/Conf.62/L.22, Official Records of the Third United nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. Vol. 9. P. 180.

72

ΠŸΡ€Π΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠŸΠΎΡ€Ρ‚ΡƒΠ³Π°Π»ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ учрСТдСния пСриодичСской ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ„Π΅Ρ€Π΅Π½Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ морским Π΄Π΅Π»Π°ΠΌ. Doc. A/Conf.62/L.23, Official Records of the Third United nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. Vol. 9. P. 181.

73

Π‘ΠΌ.: Nordquist M. et al. eds. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. A Commentary. V. 5. 1989. P. 252–253.

74

Π‘ΠΌ., Π½Π°ΠΏΡ€.: Freestone D., Oude Elferink A. Flexibility and Innovation in the Law of the Sea: Will the LOS Convention amendment procedures ever be used? // Oude Elferink A. (ed.) Stability and Change in the Law of the Sea: the Role of the LOS Convention, 2005. P. 173–183.

75

Freestone D., Barnes R., Ong D. (eds.). The Law of the Sea. Progress and Prospects. OUP, 2010. P. 14.

76

Stephen M. Schwebel, President of the International Court of Justice. Address to the United Nations General Assembly. 26 October 1999.

77

Shigeru Oda. Some Reflections on the Dispute Settlement Clauses in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea // J. Macaraczyk (ed.) Essays in International Law, in Honour of Judge Manfred Lachs, 1984. P. 115.

78

A. Boyle. Dispute Settlement and the Law of the Sea Convention: Problems of Fragmentation and Jurisdiction//International and Comparative Law Quarterly. V. 46. 1997.

79

A. Boyle. Op. cit. P. 41.

80

Π’ΡΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½ Π“Π΅Π½Π΅Ρ€Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ АссамблСи ООН, созданный для содСйствия ΠΊΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ„ΠΈΠΊΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ прогрСссивному Ρ€Π°Π·Π²ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡŽ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡƒΠ½Π°Ρ€ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Π°.

81

Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission Β«Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International LawΒ» (Analytical Study) (2006) UN Doc A/CN.4/L.682.

82

Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission Β«Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International LawΒ» (Conclusions) (2006) UN Doc A/CN/.4/L.702.

83

Π‘ΠΌ., Π½Π°ΠΏΡ€.: Alvarez J. E. International Organizations as Law-makers. OUP, 2006. Π . 259.

84

Shahabuddeen M. Precedent in the World Court. Cambridge University Press, 1996.

85

Ibid. P. 232.

86

Ibid. P. 86, 90.

87

Β«stare decisisΒ» β€“ понятиС Π² Π°Π½Π³Π»ΠΎ-амСриканской ΡŽΡ€ΠΈΡΠΏΡ€ΡƒΠ΄Π΅Π½Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΠ·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Π΅Ρ‚ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ суда ΡƒΡ‡ΠΈΡ‚Ρ‹Π²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ принятыС Ρ€Π°Π½Π΅Π΅ судСбныС Ρ€Π΅ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, благодаря Ρ‡Π΅ΠΌΡƒ формируСтся ΠΏΡ€Π΅Ρ†Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ‚.

88

Oda Sh. The International Court of Justice Viewed from the Bench (1976–1993) // Recueil des Cours, V. 244. 1993. P. 144–155.

89

Shahabuddeen M. Precedent in the World Court. P. 8–9.

90

ШинкарСцкая Π“. Π“. Π£ΠΊΠ°Π·. соч. Π‘. 100.